A comparison of balloon- versus stent-based approach for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a meta-analysis

Authors Amaninder S. Dhaliwal, Yassin Naga, Daryl Ramai, Syed M. Saghir, Sarav G. Daid, Banreet Dhindsa, Andrew Ofosu, Pushpak Taunk.

Abstract

Background Approximately 10-62% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) will develop dominant strictures at some point during their disease. Because of the paucity of available data, optimal endoscopic therapeutic strategies remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic balloon dilation vs. balloon dilation plus stenting of dominant strictures in PSC.


Methods A comprehensive literature search from inception to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were clinical and technical success. Secondary outcomes reported were adverse events (AE). Clinical success was defined in most studies as improvement in symptoms such as fever, abdominal pain, pruritus, fatigue and/or liver enzymes. The statistical analysis was done using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA Version 3).


Results The technical success rates for balloon and balloon plus stent were 96.8% and 91.9%, respectively. The clinical success rates for balloon and balloon plus stent were 86.5% and 70.8%, respectively. The overall AE rates for balloon and balloon plus stent were 11.2% and 26.9%, respectively. Other AE rates in balloon and balloon plus stent were cholangitis (4.8% vs. 11.4%), bile duct perforation (1.3% vs. 1.6%), post-procedural pancreatitis (2.2% vs. 9.8%), and bleeding (1.5% vs. 1.2%), respectively. Low to considerable heterogeneity was noted in our meta-analysis.


Conclusions Balloon dilation appears to be superior in terms of clinical and technical successes, with overall lower rates of AE compared to balloon dilation plus stenting for the management of PSC dominant strictures. Further trials are needed to validate our findings.


Keywords Balloon dilation, stenting, endoscopy, dominant strictures, primary sclerosing cholangitis


Ann Gastroenterol 2022; 35 (3): 307-316

Published
2022-05-12
Section
Original Articles