Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice

Tomohide Hori; Daiki Yasukawa; Takafumi Machimoto; Yoshio Kadokawa; Toshiyuki Hata; Tatsuo Ito; Shigeru Kato; Yuki Aisu; Yusuke Kimura; Yuichi Takamatsu; Taku Kitano; Tsunehiro Yoshimura

Authors Tomohide Hori, Daiki Yasukawa, Takafumi Machimoto, Yoshio Kadokawa, Toshiyuki Hata, Tatsuo Ito, Shigeru Kato, Yuki Aisu, Yusuke Kimura, Yuichi Takamatsu, Taku Kitano, Tsunehiro Yoshimura.

Abstract

Full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) is generally believed to result from a sliding hernia through a pelvic fascial defect, or from rectal intussusception. The currently accepted cause is a pelvic floor disorder. Surgery is the only definitive treatment, although the ideal therapeutic option for FTRP has not been determined. Auffret reported the first FTRP surgery using a perineal approach in 1882, and rectopexy using conventional laparotomy was first described by Sudeck in 1922. Laparoscopy was first used by Bermann in 1992, and laparoscopic surgery is now used worldwide; robotic surgery was first described by Munz in 2004. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates with FTRP surgery are an active research area and in this article we review previously documented surgeries and discuss the best approach for FTRP. We also introduce our institution’s laparoscopic surgical technique for FTRP (laparoscopic rectopexy with posterior wrap and peritoneal closure). Therapeutic decisions must be individualized to each patient, while the surgeon’s experience must also be considered.

Keywords Rectal prolapse, rectopexy, laparoscopic surgery, mesh, posterior wrap, peritoneal closure

Ann Gastroenterol 2018; 31 (2): 188-197