Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA; Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA; Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
aDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA (Karn Wijarnpreecha, Denise M. Harnois); bDepartment of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA (Elizabeth S. Aby, Frank J. Lukens); cDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand (Panadeekarn Panjawatanan); dDepartment of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Kamolyut Lapumnuaypol); eDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA (Wisit Cheungpasitporn); fClinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Patompong Ungprasert)
Background Recent studies have suggested an association between modest alcohol consumption and a decreased risk of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) although the results are inconsistent. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively investigate this possible association by identifying all the relevant studies and combining their results.
Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through February 2019 to identify all cross-sectional studies that compared the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among NAFLD patients who were modest alcohol drinkers to NAFLD patients who were non-drinkers. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined together using the random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.
Results A total of 6 studies with 8,936 participants fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD who were modest alcohol drinkers was significantly lower compared to patients with NAFLD who were non-drinkers with a pooled odds ratio of 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.75; I2 47%). The funnel plot was symmetric and was not suggestive of publication bias.
Conclusion A significantly lower risk of advanced liver fibrosis was observed among NAFLD patients who were modest alcohol drinkers compared to non-drinkers in this meta-analysis.
Keywords Hepatic steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcohol, liver fibrosis, meta-analysis
Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34 (4): 568-574
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases worldwide. Its estimated global prevalence is approximately 25-30% with the highest prevalence observed in the Middle East and South America [1]. Since stage of liver fibrosis is the strongest predictor for mortality in patients with NAFLD [2], interventions that can reduce the degree of liver fibrosis may also decrease mortality rate. However, there are still no medications approved for the treatment of liver fibrosis in NAFLD [3]. Few anti-fibrotic agents, such as simtuzumab and GR-MD-02, are being investigated and are currently in phase II clinical trials [4].
According to the current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidance, the diagnosis of NAFLD indicates a lack of significant alcohol consumption, defined as more than 42 g of pure alcohol per day in men and more than 28 g of pure alcohol per day in women [3]. Significant alcohol consumption is a well-established risk factor for cirrhosis while modest alcohol consumption is not associated with a significantly increased risk of cirrhosis [5]. The effect of modest alcohol consumption on NAFLD is debatable as studies that investigated the association between modest alcohol consumption and the risk of advanced liver fibrosis have yielded inconsistent results [6-12]. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to better characterize this association by comparing the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among NAFLD patients who were modest drinkers to NAFLD patients who were non-drinkers.
We systematically searched and reviewed literature in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases starting from inception through February 2019 to identify original studies that compared the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis between patients with NAFLD who were modest drinkers and patients with NAFLD who were non-drinkers. The search algorithms included the terms for “nonalcoholic fatty liver disease”, “steatohepatitis”, “alcohol consumption”, “alcoholism” and “ethanol ingestion” as described in the Online Supplementary Data 1. Three authors (K.W., P.P., and P.U.) independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the studies resulting from the search. No restrictions were applied in the systematic review. The reference lists in the full text of selected articles were reviewed to identify further relevant studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) statement as demonstrated in the Online Supplementary Data 2.
The eligible studies included were required to be cross-sectional studies of patients with NAFLD that compared the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD who were modest drinkers (generally defined as less than 28 g per day in men and less than 14 g per day in women although some variations were allowed) [13] to the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD who were non-drinkers. The eligible studies were required to provide odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for this comparison or enough raw data to calculate these data. We considered all articles irrespective of the study size or type of article, such as short reports or conference abstracts. In the case of multiple studies utilizing the same population or database, the most recent study or more comprehensive data set was included.
Three authors (K.W., P.P., and P.U.) independently reviewed the eligible studies; discrepancies were discussed and agreement was reached by the consensus. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to appraise the quality of the cross-sectional studies in 3 domains, including selection of the sample, comparability between the groups, and assessment of the outcomes [14].
The following data were extracted from each study: the citation data, the title of the study, the first author’s last name, the publication year, the study design, the country where the study was conducted, the characteristics of the population, the number of the participants, methods used to quantify alcohol consumption, the definition of modest alcohol consumption, methods used to diagnose NAFLD, the methods used to diagnose advanced liver fibrosis, the adjusted effect estimates with 95%CI, and the confounding factors adjusted for in the multivariable analysis.
To ensure the accuracy, this data extraction process was independently performed by 2 investigators (K.W. and P.P.) and was reviewed by the senior investigator (P.U.).
For the statistical analysis, we used the Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manager 5.3 software (London, United Kingdom). A P-value lower than 0.05 indicates statistical significance (except for the heterogeneity). Adjusted point estimates from each study were consolidated by the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird, which assigned the weight of each study for the pooled analysis based on its variance [15]. In light of the high probability of high between-study variance because of the different background populations and methods used to diagnose advanced liver fibrosis and definitions of modest alcohol consumption, random-effect model was chosen rather than fix-effect model. We also calculated the Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic to quantify the percentage variation across the included studies due to heterogeneity. We used an I2 cut-off of ≤25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, and >75% to represent insignificant, low, moderate and high heterogeneity, respectively [16]. We used funnel plot to assess for the presence of publication bias.
A total of 10,510 potentially eligible articles were identified using the described search strategy (3,957 from MEDLINE and 6,553 from EMBASE). After exclusion of 3,134 duplicate articles, the abstracts of 7,376 unique articles were reviewed. Seven thousand three-hundred and thirty-six manuscripts were then excluded given they were case reports, case series, correspondence items, review articles, in vitro studies, animal studies, or interventional studies. Forty articles met criteria for full-text review; however, 28 articles were excluded because they did not report the outcome of interest and 5 articles were excluded because they were descriptive studies without comparative analysis. A total of 7 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria [6-12]. However, one article was excluded since it used NAFLD fibrosis score of more than -1.455 as a cut off for advanced fibrosis [12]. We considered this cut-off to be inappropriate as it included both patients with intermediate and high probability of advanced fibrosis, instead of just high probability of advanced fibrosis. The final meta-analysis included 6 studies [6-11] with 8,936 participants. The literature retrieval, review, and selection process are shown in Fig. 1. The characteristics and quality appraisal of the included studies are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1 Literature review process NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Table 1 Main characteristics of the studies included in this meta-analysis
The prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among NAFLD patients who were modest drinkers was significantly lower than NAFLD patients who were non-drinkers with the pooled OR of 0.51 (95%CI 0.35-0.75). The between-study heterogeneity was low with an I2 of 47%. The forest plot is shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2 Forest plot of all studies SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval
Two sensitivity analyses were conducted. The first sensitivity analysis was conducted by including only studies that used histopathology to determine advanced liver fibrosis as histopathology is considered the gold-standard. A total of 4 studies were included [6-8,11]. The prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among NAFLD patients who were modest drinkers was significantly lower than NAFLD patients who were non-drinkers with the pooled OR of 0.49 (95%CI 0.36-0.66). The between-study heterogeneity was negligible with an I2 of 0%.
The second sensitivity analysis was conducted by excluding the study published as conference abstract and does not undergo peer-review yet [10]. Exclusion of this study did not significantly alter the pooled result as the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis among NAFLD patients who were modest drinkers was still significantly lower than NAFLD patients who were non-drinkers with the pooled OR of 0.56 (95%CI 0.35-0.89). The between-study heterogeneity was low with an I2 of 50%.
A funnel plot was constructed based on the effect estimate and accuracy of each study to assess for the presence of publication bias (Fig. 3). The funnel plot was symmetric and not suggestive of publication bias.
Figure 3 Funnel plot of all studies OR, odds ratio
The current study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that summarizes all available studies on the association between modest alcohol consumption and risk of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD. Interestingly, we found that modest alcohol consumption is inversely associated with advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD. The reasons for this suggested protective effect of modest alcohol consumption on presence of advanced fibrosis are not known [17]. It seems contradictory that alcohol consumption may provide a beneficial effect to the liver when excessive alcohol consumption is a well-established cause of chronic liver disease [18].
There are many possible explanations for why modest alcohol disease may be protective. The first explanation is related to insulin resistance. Studies have demonstrated that moderate alcohol consumption is associated with increased peripheral insulin sensitivity, decreased basal insulin secretion rate, and lower fasting plasma glucagon concentrations in healthy subjects [19,20]. In fact, several epidemiological studies have demonstrated a significantly lower risk of incident diabetes mellitus among moderate drinkers [21,22]. Since insulin resistance plays an important role in the development of hepatic steatosis, modest alcohol consumption may help slow down this process and thus, lower the chance of progression to liver fibrosis.
The second possible mechanism is related to adiponectin, a hormone that regulates hepatic stellate cells (HSC). Adiponectin inhibits proliferation and migration of HSC by decreasing matrix metalloproteinases-1 and increasing the expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 [23]. Studies have found the increased levels of adiponectin among alcohol drinkers [24,25], which may reduce HSC proliferation and migration, the essential steps in the development of liver fibrosis [23].
Antioxidants found in wine may also play a protective role against inflammation and subsequent fibrosis [26-28]. Red wine has been shown to have a greater anti-inflammatory effect when compared to white wine, thought to be due to higher polyphenol content [29]. In addition, work by Yamada et al suggests that modest alcohol consumption may suppress the activity of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by reducing the expression of genes involved in immune response [11].
On the other hand, this association may not be causal. It is possible that NAFLD patients with advanced liver fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis (F4) may have been strongly encouraged by their physicians to quit alcohol completely and, thus, a higher prevalence of non-drinkers among those with advanced liver fibrosis/cirrhosis.
Although the quality of included studies was high, as reflected by the high Newcastle-Ottawa scores, and the literature identification process was comprehensive, this meta-analysis has some limitations and therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. First, most of the included studies only minimally adjusted their results for potential confounders and several important confounders, such as sex, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, and comorbid conditions, were not appropriately adjusted for. Therefore, it is possible that confounders associated with alcohol consumption and behavior, not the modest alcohol consumption itself, were responsible for this apparent protective effect. Second, statistical heterogeneity was not low in the meta-analysis. We believe that the differences in study populations and methodologies were the main sources of the between-study variation. Third, almost all of the included studies were conducted in Western countries. Studies have shown that there are significant racial and ethnic disparities in NAFLD prevalence and severity [30-32]. Therefore, the generalizability of the results to other populations may be limited. Another limitation is that many of these studies have defined modest alcohol consumption without taking into account different thresholds for women vs. men.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated a significant association between modest alcohol consumption and a decreased risk of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD. However, further studies are required to determine whether this association is causal or causative.
What is already known:
Heavy alcohol consumption or binge drinking is a risk factor for developing cirrhosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
Previous studies showed that modest of alcohol consumption in patients with NAFLD may associated with decreased risk of liver fibrosis; however, the results from those studies varied considerably
What the new findings are:
This meta-analysis from 6 cross-sectional studies with 8,936 participants showed that the risk of advanced liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD was lower than those without modest alcohol consumption
However, the included studies have defined modest alcohol consumption without taking into account different thresholds for women vs. men
1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016;64:73-84.
2. Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Ekstedt M, et al. Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J Hepatol 2017;67:1265-1273.
3. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease:Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67:328-357.
4. Albhaisi S, Sanyal A. Recent advances in understanding and managing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. F1000Res 2018;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-720.
5. Rehm J, Taylor B, Mohapatra S, et al. Alcohol as a risk factor for liver cirrhosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010;29:437-445.
6. Dunn W, Sanyal AJ, Brunt EM, et al. Modest alcohol consumption is associated with decreased prevalence of steatohepatitis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J Hepatol 2012;57:384-391.
7. Kwon HK, Greenson JK, Conjeevaram HS. Effect of lifetime alcohol consumption on the histological severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int 2014;34:129-135.
8. Mitchell T, Jeffrey GP, de Boer B, et al. Type and pattern of alcohol consumption is associated with liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:1484-1493.
9. Patel PJ, Smith D, Connor JP, et al. Alcohol consumption in diabetic patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2017:7927685.
10. Unalp-Arida ARC, Kallwitz E, Daviglus M, et al. Low-moderate alcohol use is associated with a lower prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Hispanics/Latinos living in the US:Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). J Hepatol 2018;68(Suppl 1):S836-S837.
11. Yamada K, Mizukoshi E, Seike T, et al. Light alcohol consumption has the potential to suppress hepatocellular injury and liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191026.
12. Yu C, Wang L, Xue H, Lin H, Li Y, Chan SO. Association of glycated hemoglobin with the risk of advanced fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients without diabetes. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2019;43:58-66.
13. Alcohol research:current reviews editorial S. drinking patterns and their definitions. Alcohol Res 2018;39:17-18.
14. Herzog R, Alvarez-Pasquin MJ, Diaz C, Del Barrio JL, Estrada JM, Gil A. Are healthcare workers'intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes?A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013;13:154.
15. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986:7:177-188.
16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.
17. Ajmera VH, Terrault NA, Harrison SA. Is moderate alcohol use in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease good or bad?A critical review. Hepatology 2017;65:2090-2099.
18. You M, Crabb DW. Recent advances in alcoholic liver disease II. Minireview:molecular mechanisms of alcoholic fatty liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2004;287:G1-G6.
19. Bonnet F, Disse E, Laville M, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, reduced basal insulin secretion rate and lower fasting glucagon concentration in healthy women. Diabetologia 2012;55:3228-3237.
20. Lazarus R, Sparrow D, Weiss ST. Alcohol intake and insulin levels. The normative aging study. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:909-916.
21. Baliunas DO, Taylor BJ, Irving H, et al. Alcohol as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2009;32:2123-2132.
22. Carlsson S, Hammar N, Grill V, Kaprio J. Alcohol consumption and the incidence of type 2 diabetes:a 20-year follow-up of the finnish twin cohort study. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2785-2790.
23. Ramezani-Moghadam M, Wang J, Ho V, et al. Adiponectin reduces hepatic stellate cell migration by promoting tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) secretion. J Biol Chem 2015;290:5533-5542.
24. Pischon T, Girman CJ, Rifai N, Hotamisligil GS, Rimm EB. Association between dietary factors and plasma adiponectin concentrations in men. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:780-786.
25. Sierksma A, Patel H, Ouchi N, et al. Effect of moderate alcohol consumption on adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 2004;27:184-189.
26. Ajmo JM, Liang X, Rogers CQ, Pennock B, You M. Resveratrol alleviates alcoholic fatty liver in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2008;295:G833-G842.
27. Becker U, Gronbaek M, Johansen D, Sorensen TI. Lower risk for alcohol-induced cirrhosis in wine drinkers. Hepatology 2002;35:868-875.
28. Dunn W, Xu R, Schwimmer JB. Modest wine drinking and decreased prevalence of suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2008;47:1947-1954.
29. Sacanella E, Vazquez-Agell M, Mena MP, et al. Down-regulation of adhesion molecules and other inflammatory biomarkers after moderate wine consumption in healthy women:a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:1463-1469.
30. Rich NE, Oji S, Mufti AR, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence, severity, and outcomes in the United States:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:198-210.e2.
31. Tabibian JH, Lazo M, Durazo FA, Yeh HC, Tong MJ, Clark JM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease across ethno-racial groups:do Asian-American adults represent a new at-risk population?J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:501-509.
32. Weston SR, Leyden W, Murphy R, et al. Racial and ethnic distribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver in persons with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease. Hepatology 2005;41:372-379.