Pyeloduodenal fistula diagnosed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Tomoyuki Kitagawa, Koichiro Sato, Iruru Maetani

Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to: Tomoyuki Kitagawa, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153 8515 Japan, Tel.: +81 3 3468 1251, Fax: +81 3 3468 1269, e-mail: tomoyuki.kitagawa@med.toho-u.ac.jp
Received 21 October 2014; accepted 29 October 2014
© 2015 Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology

A 58-year-old male received treatment for right ureteral stone, including non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief. Owing to persistent abdominal pain he underwent computed tomography that revealed right hydronephrosis and abdominal abscess, managed by right ureteral stent placement. However, his symptoms did not resolve and an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed which revealed a penetrating duodenal ulcer in the second portion of the duodenum (Fig. 1). Three days later he underwent a second EGD this time under fluoroscopic guidance, which revealed a fistula penetrating the right renal pelvis (Fig. 2). The patient continued to receive conservative treatment, leading to scarring and resolution of the duodenal ulcer without necessitating surgery.

thumblarge

Figure 1 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a fistula in the duodenum

thumblarge

Figure 2 Duodenography using an endoscope demonstrated the right renal pelvis (red arrow)

First described in 1893 [1], pyeloduodenal fistulas are frequently diagnosed using intravenous or retrograde pyelography, although the rate of diagnosis is low [2]; the diagnosis of these lesions using duodenography is also rare. The present case is very rare in that the fistula was confirmed by EGD. Surgical treatment is often selected for similar cases, however, conservative management may be tried in selected cases when the renal function is preserved [3]. In the present case, the patient’s renal function was preserved and the infection could be controlled, so surgery could be avoided. This disorder is difficult to diagnose, but our case suggests that EGD may be useful in such cases.

References

1. Cohen MH, Becker MH, Hotchkiss RS, Pyeloduodenal fistula: report of a case and review of the literatureJ Urol 1966; 95: 678-680.

2. Rodney K, Maxted WC, Pahira JJ, Pyeloduodenal fistulaUrology 1983; 22: 536-539.

3. Baraket O, Lahmidi MA, Chaari Mi, A pyeloduodenal fistula. Report of caseTunis Med 2013; 91: 745-746.

Notes

Conflict of Interest: None